
From the Divinity School, our tour guide brought us across the street to the library's most modern building, the New Bodleian Library, which was built in 1938. It's composed mainly of stacks, eight floors total, with a few reading rooms as well. The Bodleian Library is a reference library, and no books ever officially leave the building. As we entered the four floors of subterranean stacks, it was impossible not to notice the signs of warning posted on and near the door. They read something like this: "Entering the stacks at night? Have you told someone where you're going?" and "Lost? Follow the stripe on the floor to the exit." I think it must be every librarian's secret nightmare, to be lost in the labyrinthine stacks, forever searching for the way out.
The stacks in the Bodleian are on movable tracks to maximize space, and the books are organized by size for the same reason. Unlike the British Library, however, the Bodleian has incorporated some aspects of Dewey Decimal into the catalog. Our guide informed us that, although all the Bodleian catalogs are available on CD, there is no subject cataloging for the collection. I found it very interesting to hear that subject searches in the Bodleian are routed through other institutions, such as the Library of Congress, to identify items or authors. This information is then used to search the Bodleian catalog. It seems to me that a research library, especially one with the history and reputation of the Bodleian, could benefit from some subject indexing. I believe that the catalog might see an increase in use as a result.
Our guide, although not a librarian, was able to tell us that the Bodleian Library is struggling with many of the same issues as other libraries worldwide. Developments in technology are raising questions about acquisition. For instance, the library must decide whether to keep an individual, physical map, or the map on CD-ROM. As a library of deposit, entitled to a copy of every book published in Britain, the Bodleian also has special issues related to storage space versus acquisition. It's always a sensitive issue, deciding what should be preserved for the future, and our guide informed us that the library holds a collection of Mills & Boone, the British equivalent of Harlequin romances, in an off-site location. I was pleased to hear that this ancient, respected institution is so broad and democratic in its collection development, especially in light of its challenges in regards to space. It's impossible to predict what may be of interest to future generations, and it's libraries like the Bodleian which must preserve this material.
