Unlike the British Library, the National Art Library is not restricted to collecting only British publications, and as a result covers some areas missed in the British Library's collections. The National Art Library is therefore a very important resource for researchers interested in art in all its various forms. The library holds approximately 8,000 periodicals, 2,500 of which are current, and a large collection of exhibition and sales catalogs. The sales catalogs, collected from various auction houses, are invaluable resources for determining the provenance of a work of art, and the annotated catalogs can be even more useful as they provide information about the paintings' past market value. In addition, the library attempts to collect three copies of each item published by the Victoria & Albert Museum, one of which is kept pristine for archive purposes only. The collection dates back, in some cases, to the 1700's, and the library is continuously working on collection development and acquisition. Space has been a severe limiter to acquisition, and we were shown the cataloging backlog for the library, which extended along the whole of the communal office space's wall. Apparently, the uncataloged items are still available for use by the public, although their uncataloged status can only be an irritation for the librarians. There is a hope for some off-site, underground storage in Salisbury, which would help alleviate some of the problems related to space.
Tuesday, 31 July 2007
National Art Library at the V&A
Unlike the British Library, the National Art Library is not restricted to collecting only British publications, and as a result covers some areas missed in the British Library's collections. The National Art Library is therefore a very important resource for researchers interested in art in all its various forms. The library holds approximately 8,000 periodicals, 2,500 of which are current, and a large collection of exhibition and sales catalogs. The sales catalogs, collected from various auction houses, are invaluable resources for determining the provenance of a work of art, and the annotated catalogs can be even more useful as they provide information about the paintings' past market value. In addition, the library attempts to collect three copies of each item published by the Victoria & Albert Museum, one of which is kept pristine for archive purposes only. The collection dates back, in some cases, to the 1700's, and the library is continuously working on collection development and acquisition. Space has been a severe limiter to acquisition, and we were shown the cataloging backlog for the library, which extended along the whole of the communal office space's wall. Apparently, the uncataloged items are still available for use by the public, although their uncataloged status can only be an irritation for the librarians. There is a hope for some off-site, underground storage in Salisbury, which would help alleviate some of the problems related to space.
Sunday, 29 July 2007
Keats' House
The Keats' House Museum currently holds a relatively small collection of items, partially due to the renovation work being undertaken, although many of items still on display are highly personal and therefore of great interest to Keats enthusiasts. Among the more fascinating objects in the Keats' House Museum are locks of Keats' and Fanny Brawne's hair, Keats' writing desk, and both a life mask and a death mask, displayed side by side in a room where Keats often spent time writing and reading. The museum also displays the engagement ring given by John Keats to his neighbor and fiancee, Fanny Brawne. While these items are powerful relics of the poet's life, the museum's main attraction for visitors lies in its gardens, activities, and its plans for renovation.
Saturday, 28 July 2007
National Portrait Gallery
Today I visited the National Portrait Gallery as one of my independent site visits. I chose this museum, not only because of my personal interest in British history, but because I was excited to see the portraits of my two paper subjects: Jane Austen and John Keats. Actually, to be completely honest I was not aware that Cassandra's portrait of Jane Austen was in the National Portrait Gallery's collections. I knew that it was the only portrait painted of her from life, and it never occurred to me that it might be on display in this national museum. Instead, I had come to the National Portrait Gallery to see an image of John Keats and the other historical and literary figures who had fascinated me for most of my life.
The museum was founded by the British government during the reign of Queen Victoria, and its policy is to admit works according to historical, rather than artistic, merit. I found this to be a particularly fascinating policy, especially for a museum filled to capacity with works of art. Upon further reflection, though, it's a policy that makes sense. If the museum determined to purchase or accept donations of only artistically important portraits, many of the featured portraits would never have been acquired. A good example is my favorite find, Cassandra's portrait of her sister Jane Austen. The portrait is amateurish at best, even family members admitted it was not a good likeness, and any museum purchasing artistically important works would have been forced to pass it over. However, the portrait is the only one painted of Jane Austen from life, and her importance to British literature and history is undeniable. The peculiar acquisition policy of the National Portrait Gallery ensures that small treasures such as these are not lost. Another interesting point in the acquisition policy was changed during the 1960's. Before that time, no portrait of a living sitter was admitted to the collection, excepting British monarchs. This policy has now been changed, and portraits of famous Brits such as J.K. Rowling and David Beckham are displayed along with Queen Elizabeth II.
Upon arriving at the museum, I followed the natural flow up the escalator to the Tudor room. This room not only introduced me to the museum's collections, but also to the way the collection is organized. The portraits are hung primarily by historical time period, and within that time frame by type of sitter. Visitors are led to the Tudors, where most of the paintings are of royalty and nobility. The high points of this room were portraits of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, and further on, Shakespeare himself. The visitor is then led through conveniently numbered rooms which provide a fascinating tour through the history of England. Many of the portraits are of recognizable names and faces, but a great many were of people I didn't have previous knowledge of. Each portrait is accompanied by a small plaque listing not only the name of the artist and sitter, but also a short history of the sitter's importance to the nation. The nature of the displays, and the museum as a whole, made for a very interesting visit. It is possible, with very little effort, to learn a great deal about the history of Britain.
By far my favorite room in the National Portrait Gallery was the Romantics. This room immediately struck me as a gold mine, because when I entered I saw the recognizable faces of Mary Shelley and Lord Byron. I was very excited to examine the portraits in the room, and my happy mood was cemented when I happened across what, to me, was an unimaginable treasure: Jane Austen's portrait. It is very small and unassuming, but had a remarkable effect on me. I was thrilled to be able to look upon the portrait of a favorite author, especially as it had been drawn by her most beloved sister. By a strange, serendipitous circumstance, John Keats' portrait had been hung directly behind Jane Austen's, so I was able to view both of my paper subjects in one spot!
In short, I found my visit to the National Portrait Gallery to be both informative and very entertaining. Apart from the portraits of my subject authors, I was able to see the portraits of many other favorite writers and historical figures. My favorites included Virginia Woolf, Shakespeare, William Blake, and, interestingly, George Washington. I was also able to make a passing acquaintance with new and interesting people about whom I hadn't known much. For instance, I was drawn to a portrait of a fresh-faced, flirtatious young woman who turned out to be Nell Gwynn, an actress and the mistress of King Charles II. I think that this demonstrates the particular effectiveness of the gallery. Visitors are encouraged, and would be hard-pressed to resist the urge, to wander the gallery, stopping at interesting and familiar faces. The portraits make it easier to connect to these important people, and therefore make it much easier to connect to history and heritage.
The museum was founded by the British government during the reign of Queen Victoria, and its policy is to admit works according to historical, rather than artistic, merit. I found this to be a particularly fascinating policy, especially for a museum filled to capacity with works of art. Upon further reflection, though, it's a policy that makes sense. If the museum determined to purchase or accept donations of only artistically important portraits, many of the featured portraits would never have been acquired. A good example is my favorite find, Cassandra's portrait of her sister Jane Austen. The portrait is amateurish at best, even family members admitted it was not a good likeness, and any museum purchasing artistically important works would have been forced to pass it over. However, the portrait is the only one painted of Jane Austen from life, and her importance to British literature and history is undeniable. The peculiar acquisition policy of the National Portrait Gallery ensures that small treasures such as these are not lost. Another interesting point in the acquisition policy was changed during the 1960's. Before that time, no portrait of a living sitter was admitted to the collection, excepting British monarchs. This policy has now been changed, and portraits of famous Brits such as J.K. Rowling and David Beckham are displayed along with Queen Elizabeth II.
Upon arriving at the museum, I followed the natural flow up the escalator to the Tudor room. This room not only introduced me to the museum's collections, but also to the way the collection is organized. The portraits are hung primarily by historical time period, and within that time frame by type of sitter. Visitors are led to the Tudors, where most of the paintings are of royalty and nobility. The high points of this room were portraits of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, and further on, Shakespeare himself. The visitor is then led through conveniently numbered rooms which provide a fascinating tour through the history of England. Many of the portraits are of recognizable names and faces, but a great many were of people I didn't have previous knowledge of. Each portrait is accompanied by a small plaque listing not only the name of the artist and sitter, but also a short history of the sitter's importance to the nation. The nature of the displays, and the museum as a whole, made for a very interesting visit. It is possible, with very little effort, to learn a great deal about the history of Britain.
By far my favorite room in the National Portrait Gallery was the Romantics. This room immediately struck me as a gold mine, because when I entered I saw the recognizable faces of Mary Shelley and Lord Byron. I was very excited to examine the portraits in the room, and my happy mood was cemented when I happened across what, to me, was an unimaginable treasure: Jane Austen's portrait. It is very small and unassuming, but had a remarkable effect on me. I was thrilled to be able to look upon the portrait of a favorite author, especially as it had been drawn by her most beloved sister. By a strange, serendipitous circumstance, John Keats' portrait had been hung directly behind Jane Austen's, so I was able to view both of my paper subjects in one spot!
In short, I found my visit to the National Portrait Gallery to be both informative and very entertaining. Apart from the portraits of my subject authors, I was able to see the portraits of many other favorite writers and historical figures. My favorites included Virginia Woolf, Shakespeare, William Blake, and, interestingly, George Washington. I was also able to make a passing acquaintance with new and interesting people about whom I hadn't known much. For instance, I was drawn to a portrait of a fresh-faced, flirtatious young woman who turned out to be Nell Gwynn, an actress and the mistress of King Charles II. I think that this demonstrates the particular effectiveness of the gallery. Visitors are encouraged, and would be hard-pressed to resist the urge, to wander the gallery, stopping at interesting and familiar faces. The portraits make it easier to connect to these important people, and therefore make it much easier to connect to history and heritage.
Wednesday, 25 July 2007
Writer's Museum

In short, I found this museum to be on the small and sparse side, but I was impressed with what they had accomplished with limited resources. For a small museum with limited scope, it was remarkably successful in communicating the importance of Scottish writers not only to Scotland, but to the wider world and humanity in general. I hope that the museum will continue to expand its holdings and experiment in its presentation of them to museum visitors. If the Writer's Museum focuses on continuously improving service to the public, I believe it is possible for it to become a hidden gem in a city of great museums and historical attractions.
Monday, 23 July 2007
National Archives of Scotland
This afternoon we visited the National Archives of Scotland, where we were given a lecture about the Archives' work and history, and then given a chance to see some of the treasures of the archive. The archives are housed in three buildings, with the main site being General Register House on Princes Street. General Register House was built in 1774 by Robert Adam, and is currently undergoing renovation to link it to the General Registers nearby. This will allow researchers to better use both collections. The National Archives' collection dates from the 12th century, and provides access to many official documents, including legal papers, church records, and government papers. The Archives allow free access to materials, although digital images or copies may be presented instead of originals for many of the more delicate items. Patrons are allowed to make copies of the materials, although there is a charge for this service. The General Registers, on the other hand, provides access to documents regarding births, deaths and marriages, so the refurbishment will allow researchers to continue their research in the National Archives after completing initial searches in the General Registers. Both institutions will be required to make some minor changes in their practice when this project is completed. The National Archives has traditionally provided service to the public for free, while the General Registers has charged. To provide equity in service, the new practice will be to provide a certain amount of research time for free, with a charge for additional time. The second site of the National Archives is known as West Register House, and was opened in the 1970's. It is located in what was St. George's Church in Charlotte Square. The third site, Thomas Thomson House, allows no public access but is large enough to accommodate expansion. The expansion would, our lecturer explained, hopefully allow room for a research room at the site. Currently, Thomas Thomson House is the location for the Archives' conservation projects. Expansion may be necessary very soon, as our lecturer informed us that the collection is always growing, and space is at a premium.
Our speaker explained to us that Scotland has the happy distinction of possessing some of the best-kept official records in the world. The Archives have been preserving official documents for centuries, and genealogists worldwide have a much easier time of finding information in Scotland than in many other places throughout the world. To assist these researchers, the National Archives makes its catalog and many additional resources available on its website. Additional resources include links to the Scottish Records Advisory Council, the Scottish Archives Network, Scottish Archives for Schools, Scotland's People, and Scottish Handwriting. The link to Scottish Archives for Schools is particularly interesting, as it shows both the educational possibilities of the Archives' collection and the Archives' willingness to work with all areas of the public. Scottish Handwriting is also a unique link; it educates users about how to decode handwriting, and provides a series of tutorials for visitors. This service undoubtedly enriches the quality of information gleaned from the collections.
One of the interesting issues raised by our visit to General Register House was the question of what should be preserved in the archive. Our lecturer explained to us that government offices are instructed to save important papers for eventual placement in the archive. Problems have arisen with too many items saved for preservation, and the National Archive has provided training to government offices about what qualifies for placement in the archive. Additionally, the development of certain technologies, specifically photocopying, has made the work of the archivists more difficult. The Archives always aims to preserve the initial document, and this document has become more difficult to identify, in many cases, because of the widespread practice of photocopying.
Our visit was ended in glorious fashion by the presentation of some of the Archives' treasures. These included a letter written by Mary Queen of Scots in 1550, a cookery book written in 1727, Journals of the Commissioner for the Union of the Kingdoms from 1706, and criminal case files for Janet Arthur (a.k.a. Fanny Parker), a suffragette prisoner. Additionally, a scroll of the Record of the Exchequer from 1495 was shown to us, as well as the passage marking the earliest reference to Aquae Vitae, or whisky, known to the Archive. Seeing these items makes it patently clear how important the act of preservation and conservation can be for an informed society. If organizations like the National Archives had not endeavored to collect and preserve items such as these amazing treasures, we would now be unable to see and learn from them.
Our speaker explained to us that Scotland has the happy distinction of possessing some of the best-kept official records in the world. The Archives have been preserving official documents for centuries, and genealogists worldwide have a much easier time of finding information in Scotland than in many other places throughout the world. To assist these researchers, the National Archives makes its catalog and many additional resources available on its website. Additional resources include links to the Scottish Records Advisory Council, the Scottish Archives Network, Scottish Archives for Schools, Scotland's People, and Scottish Handwriting. The link to Scottish Archives for Schools is particularly interesting, as it shows both the educational possibilities of the Archives' collection and the Archives' willingness to work with all areas of the public. Scottish Handwriting is also a unique link; it educates users about how to decode handwriting, and provides a series of tutorials for visitors. This service undoubtedly enriches the quality of information gleaned from the collections.
One of the interesting issues raised by our visit to General Register House was the question of what should be preserved in the archive. Our lecturer explained to us that government offices are instructed to save important papers for eventual placement in the archive. Problems have arisen with too many items saved for preservation, and the National Archive has provided training to government offices about what qualifies for placement in the archive. Additionally, the development of certain technologies, specifically photocopying, has made the work of the archivists more difficult. The Archives always aims to preserve the initial document, and this document has become more difficult to identify, in many cases, because of the widespread practice of photocopying.
Our visit was ended in glorious fashion by the presentation of some of the Archives' treasures. These included a letter written by Mary Queen of Scots in 1550, a cookery book written in 1727, Journals of the Commissioner for the Union of the Kingdoms from 1706, and criminal case files for Janet Arthur (a.k.a. Fanny Parker), a suffragette prisoner. Additionally, a scroll of the Record of the Exchequer from 1495 was shown to us, as well as the passage marking the earliest reference to Aquae Vitae, or whisky, known to the Archive. Seeing these items makes it patently clear how important the act of preservation and conservation can be for an informed society. If organizations like the National Archives had not endeavored to collect and preserve items such as these amazing treasures, we would now be unable to see and learn from them.
National Library of Scotland

The Murray Archive consists of many letters, manuscripts, and books


Thursday, 19 July 2007
Bodleian Library

From the Divinity School, our tour guide brought us across the street to the library's most modern building, the New Bodleian Library, which was built in 1938. It's composed mainly of stacks, eight floors total, with a few reading rooms as well. The Bodleian Library is a reference library, and no books ever officially leave the building. As we entered the four floors of subterranean stacks, it was impossible not to notice the signs of warning posted on and near the door. They read something like this: "Entering the stacks at night? Have you told someone where you're going?" and "Lost? Follow the stripe on the floor to the exit." I think it must be every librarian's secret nightmare, to be lost in the labyrinthine stacks, forever searching for the way out.
The stacks in the Bodleian are on movable tracks to maximize space, and the books are organized by size for the same reason. Unlike the British Library, however, the Bodleian has incorporated some aspects of Dewey Decimal into the catalog. Our guide informed us that, although all the Bodleian catalogs are available on CD, there is no subject cataloging for the collection. I found it very interesting to hear that subject searches in the Bodleian are routed through other institutions, such as the Library of Congress, to identify items or authors. This information is then used to search the Bodleian catalog. It seems to me that a research library, especially one with the history and reputation of the Bodleian, could benefit from some subject indexing. I believe that the catalog might see an increase in use as a result.
Our guide, although not a librarian, was able to tell us that the Bodleian Library is struggling with many of the same issues as other libraries worldwide. Developments in technology are raising questions about acquisition. For instance, the library must decide whether to keep an individual, physical map, or the map on CD-ROM. As a library of deposit, entitled to a copy of every book published in Britain, the Bodleian also has special issues related to storage space versus acquisition. It's always a sensitive issue, deciding what should be preserved for the future, and our guide informed us that the library holds a collection of Mills & Boone, the British equivalent of Harlequin romances, in an off-site location. I was pleased to hear that this ancient, respected institution is so broad and democratic in its collection development, especially in light of its challenges in regards to space. It's impossible to predict what may be of interest to future generations, and it's libraries like the Bodleian which must preserve this material.

Wednesday, 18 July 2007
Jane Austen Centre

Any visit to the museum begins with a short lecture outlining Jane Austen's life and work. She was a member of a large family with only one sister, to whom she was devoted. Two of her brothers had successful naval careers, which helps to explain the generally positive light Jane Austen cast on her naval characters, and one brother followed in his father's footsteps to join the church. Neither Jane nor her sister Cassandra ever married. Cassandra's fiancee died, after which she lived as though a widow, and Jane's only engagement lasted only one night. Jane Austen's life seems to have been dedicated to her family and to her writing.

The regular exhibition was somewhat overshadowed by this special collection, but included text-based displays about Jane Austen's life and work, as well as examples of fashion and furniture contemporary to her time in Bath. The atmosphere was enhanced by the Centre's building, which is very similar to what would have been Jane Austen's home in Bath. It is believed that the Austen family occupied two floors of number 25 Gay Street, just up the hill from the Centre. This is one of the family's four addresses during their six years in Bath, which ended with the death of Jane Austen's father in 1806.

Tuesday, 17 July 2007
St. Paul's Cathedral Library

The first room we visited in St. Paul's Cathedral was, it is commonly believed, initially intended to be the library. It's not known why the library was placed elsewhere, but now the room holds Christopher Wren's Great Model of the cathedral. It's the inital model of what Christopher Wren wanted to build, although it was rejected due to its resemblance to St. Peter's in Rome. Wren was adamant that he wanted a dome, and the city was adamant that they wanted a spire. Therefore, Wren created a plan with a spire atop the dome, altered the floor plan slightly, and the plans were approved. It's easy to see, however, that Wren ended up much where he started. There is no spire, and the current cathedral is very much like the original plan. I suppose that, by the time it was built, it was too late to make changes. It's easier to apologize than to ask permission, I suppose. It's hard to complain, St. Paul's seems perfect to me!
The room that now houses the library in St. Paul's immediately struck me as the perfect embodiment of a library. It's old books on dark wood shelves, marble busts, and felt-covered tables in a dim, quiet room spoke to my book-loving soul. Mr. Wisdom was also able to point out some architectural details that I would have missed. In the past, people were able to read architecture much like we today read text. This room would have been readily identifiable as the library, not only by the presence of the books, but also by the nature of the wood carving around the shelves. There are representations of books and grapes beneath a skull flanked by wheat sheaves. This symbolizes learning and liturgy, communion, and Christ's triumph over death. These carvings would have told anyone who knew how to interpret them that they were standing in a cathedral library.


Monday, 16 July 2007
The Museum of London


One of the most fascinating items on display in the gallery for prehistory is a plaster cast taken from a clay container. The cast shows, quite clearly, the impression of a fingertip pressed into wet clay while decorating the jug. It's a small, slender fingertip with a long, manicured nail. Nothing else in the collection brought home so clearly the fact that these artifacts were crafted and used by individuals with their own life stories. That one object was, I believe the most effective in communicating the message of the importance of people in prehistoric London. Very close to it in effectiveness, however, was the facial reconstruction of a woman who lived in London between 5100 to 5640 years ago. Having a science-based representation of an actual human being was very powerful. Another interesting item, pointed out by the prehistory curator, was a human skull of an individual who had undergone, and survived, trepanning. This was a medical procedure where a hole was cut into the skull to relieve pressure. It seems a very advanced procedure for a society without the benefits of modern medicine!
The Museum of London was undergoing renovations at the time of our visit, so we were unable to view all of the exhibits. Still, the exhibits for the Great Fire of London, Roman London, and Medieval London were quite interesting enough to make the visit more than worthwhile. The available exhibits, and the fact of the remodel, helps to underscore what the senior curator of prehistory called the purpose of the museum: providing access. Providing access to its collections, its information, and to the very history of London itself.
Friday, 13 July 2007
Parliament

The palace was rebuilt in 1845 after a fire, and the current building reflects the power and influence of Victoria, who was queen at the time. Her initials, V.R., for Victoria Regina, can be seen everywhere in the carvings, and Prince Albert was in charge of selecting the artwork still on display in the palace. The art centers around two themes: King Arthur and royalty. There are several paintings promoting the virtues of the round table crew, and the remainder are of British royalty. The House of Lords is very impressive, all red leather and dark wood, with the unmistakable presence of the gilt throne at one end. The throne is blocked off by a gate at all times, except when the Queen arrives for the annual speech. At that time, the gates are removed and a second throne added for Prince Phillip. Our guide explained that, although there is space for Prince Charles and Princess Anne on the dais, neither has attended in recent years. Through the opposite end of the House of Lords is the small chamber that connects to the House of Commons. In it are several statues of the better-known prime ministers in Britain's past. My personal favorites were, of course, Winston Churchill and Britain's first female prime minister, Margaret Thatcher.
The House of Commons is slightly less imposing than the House of Lords, due to the lack of the throne, but I gather it is a much livelier scene. There are two lines to either side of the chamber, separating the left benches from the right. These lines are called sword-lines, and are said to be exactly two sword-lengths apart. They were placed there to keep members of parliament from "having a go" at each other. Our guide also took us through the side chambers, where MP's line up to have their votes counted. It seems to me that they have an ingeniously simple process, here. In order to vote in the House of Commons, you must be physically present to be counted. It cuts out the worry about people placing votes for absent members, whether with or without permission. Perhaps Congress should consider this system!
After viewing the two primary sites for governing the United Kingdom, we were led into St. Stephen's Hall. It is now an entrance gallery, but it is also the site of the original House of Commons. This is the area where, according to our guide, Benjamin Franklin appealed to the British government for independence. The House of Commons as it exists today is an almost exact replica of the original, which was bombed in the blitz during World War II. It's a shame that it was damaged, but at the same time the new layout seems like it would be more convenient for running the government. The House of Commons now runs parallel to the House of Lords, rather than perpendicular to it. It has a certain symmetry, I think.
Our exit from Parliament was through Westminster Hall, which once housed the Courts of Justice. It was surreal to think that we were standing on the site where famous and infamous alike had stood to face their fates. William Wallace, of Braveheart fame, St. Thomas More and Charles I were all tried in this location. Interestingly enough, all were put to death. I'd hate to draw any conclusions about the British system of justice from this circumstance! It was a fascinating and new experience, to view the center of a foreign government. Although the two systems are quite different, there are some significant similarities as well.
Thursday, 12 July 2007
The British Library

In its new location, the British Library strives to meet the goals it has always held: 1. To acquire the national bibliographic archive, 2. To keep the national bibliographic record, and 3. To make the bibliographic record available. The first two goals are fairly standard for most libraries, although the scope of the British Library makes it unique. What I found most interesting was its third goal, the focus on access. The collections of the British Library can be traced back to 1753, to Sir Hans Sloane's collection in Montague House, the bequest of which formed the core collection of the British Library. Sir Hans Sloane believed that his collection should be accessible to any who sought knowledge, and allowed the public to consult his personal library. The British Library has continued the tradition without fail, and for a library this old to focus on free public access is, to me, very impressive and forward-thinking. To this day, any individual, eighteen years old or older, who wishes to consult an item is allowed to view it in one of the eleven reading rooms.
One of the most surprising revelations during this visit was that the British Library classifies its holdings by size. This flies against all of my experience and knowledge of classification, cataloging, and access. However, upon further examination it does seem to have many practical benefits. A library with hundreds of miles of shelving cannot afford to use time and resources to shift the collection each time new acquisitions are made. Classifying by size eliminates the need for shifting, as whenever new holdings arrive, they can be grouped in new shelving without disturbing the classification system. This would save a great deal of resources, and provided the collection is well-cataloged and shelved correctly, would not have any negative effect on access. This would not be the case in public, circulating libraries, however, where browsing is such an important activity.
After our tour, several of us took the opportunity to browse some of the library's treasures. It was a little bit overwhelming, entering a room filled with so many wonderful books! I felt like a kid in a candy store, wandering from Shakespeare's First Folio to Charlotte Bronte's manuscript of Jane Eyre, from Lady Jane Grey's prayer book to a child's greeting card with the hurriedly scrawled lyrics to a Beatle's song. They also have on display an original copy of the Magna Carta, and one of the Gutenberg Bibles. My only disappointment was that I had just missed Beowulf, which had been removed from the display only days before our tour. I will have to console myself that this requires another visit to London!
In short, this library is not only a treasure for Britain's people, but a world treasure. Every written language in the world is represented in the British Library's holdings, and every citizen with the desire and the means to travel to the British Library to consult the collection is not only allowed, but welcomed. I can think of no better example of classic library principles in action.
In short, this library is not only a treasure for Britain's people, but a world treasure. Every written language in the world is represented in the British Library's holdings, and every citizen with the desire and the means to travel to the British Library to consult the collection is not only allowed, but welcomed. I can think of no better example of classic library principles in action.
Tuesday, 10 July 2007
Stratford-upon-Avon

Perhaps my favorite aspect of the Stratford visit was the exhibition in Nash's House centering around the collected works of Shakespeare. It was fascinating to read about the development of the collected works from the First Folio all the way to the Oxford Shakespeare which we can buy in any bookstore today. I was unaware that many of the early printed versions were written almost entirely from playgoer's memories, and that there had been an entire movement to sanitize Shakespeare. Imagining Shakespeare without the bawdy references, both the subtle and the not-so-subtle, was an eye-opener. My anti-censorship sentiment was strengthened by it! While all these elements of the exhibition were fascinating, my most treasured experience at Stratford was discovering the collected works of Shakespeare owned by the poet John Keats on display in the exhibition. The book was opened to the first page of King Lear, and in Keats' own hand was written his poem "On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again." As a fan of Keats, I was overwhelmed.

The overwhelming effect this Stratford visit had on me was the importance of preservation. The ability to view places and items of historical and cultural importance has a greater effect on personal emotion and memory than reading and discussion ever will. Knowing that New Place, the home of Shakespeare in his adulthood, had been demolished and is now lost, had a remarkably strong effect on me. Knowing that it had been destroyed by the owner out of spite, because he would not be paid for the annoyance of Shakespeare pilgrims visiting his home, was even worse. The thought of this lost treasure, and others like it, underlines the importance of recognizing places and items of importance early, and securing them for future generations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)